The Federal Ethics Inquiry what is new? Well, lets cut through what everyone is saying is new--the contradictions from his previous testimonies as these can be explained either in terms of understanding his point of view, arising a new issue, or discrediting him as a witness—and instead face the truth that the water will become murkier (that no one should reasonably expect too many details that will implicate someone will be confirmed). My guess is what will be confirmed is what everyone probably has already expected: that there were shady deals, certainly legally questionable but nothing to be proven (or to be shown to be on the wrong side of the legal fence) as virtually all evidence will be hearsay.
