In regards to the current federal ethics inquiry. If they aspect to get anywhere not only are they going to offer not to expedite him they are going to have to offer immunity, if they have not done so far, for any of his actions: unless I am mistaken paying a public official including a politician is against the law. If immunity is not offered does anyone really think this man is going to tell anything really new? Another matter is his expedition itself: should we offer not to do it in return for his testimony? As far as I am concern we should send him to Germany. The reason for this is how can we aspect other governments to expedite people to us if we are not willing to do it for them; furthermore, some will say this is an exception because of the importance that he may have to offer. To this I reply let the historians tear apart our former Prime Minister; for the rest of us this should be considered a pass matter for the present as we have more pressing matters to-get-to rather than bring-back-to-life a dead political soap.
